↓ Skip to main content

A four-phase model of transdisciplinary team-based research: goals, team processes, and strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Translational Behavioral Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
Title
A four-phase model of transdisciplinary team-based research: goals, team processes, and strategies
Published in
Translational Behavioral Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13142-012-0167-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kara L. Hall, Amanda L Vogel, Brooke A Stipelman, Daniel Stokols, Glen Morgan, Sarah Gehlert

Abstract

The complexity of social and public health challenges has led to burgeoning interest and investments in cross-disciplinary team-based research, and particularly in transdisciplinary (TD) team-based research. TD research aims to integrate and ultimately extend beyond discipline-specific concepts, approaches, and methods to accelerate innovations and progress toward solving complex real-world problems. While TD research offers the promise of novel, wide-reaching and important discoveries, it also introduces unique challenges. In particular, today's investigators are generally trained in unidisciplinary approaches, and may have little training in, or exposure to, the scientific skills and team processes necessary to collaborate successfully in teams of colleagues from widely disparate disciplines and fields. Yet these skills are essential to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of TD team-based research. In the current article we propose a model of TD team-based research that includes four relatively distinct phases: development, conceptualization, implementation, and translation. Drawing on the science of team science (SciTS) field, as well as the findings from previous research on group dynamics and organizational behavior, we identify key scientific goals and team processes that occur in each phase and across multiple phases. We then provide real-world exemplars for each phase that highlight strategies for successfully meeting the goals and engaging in the team processes that are hallmarks of that phase. We conclude by discussing the relevance of the model for TD team-based research initiatives, funding to support these initiatives, and future empirical research that aims to better understand the processes and outcomes of TD team-based research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 273 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 14%
Other 27 10%
Student > Master 24 8%
Professor 24 8%
Other 67 24%
Unknown 62 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 51 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 9%
Psychology 23 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 6%
Engineering 15 5%
Other 77 27%
Unknown 73 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,583,490
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Translational Behavioral Medicine
#232
of 988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,788
of 183,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Behavioral Medicine
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.