↓ Skip to main content

The impedance method for monitoring total coliforms in wastewaters

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Microbiologica, March 1984
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 744)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
The impedance method for monitoring total coliforms in wastewaters
Published in
Folia Microbiologica, March 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf02872933
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. M. Strauss, G. W. Malaney, R. D. Tanner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 50%
Engineering 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,719,264
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Folia Microbiologica
#44
of 744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#936
of 8,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Microbiologica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 744 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them