↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the validity of the Glidewell–Lloyd extension of Clar’s π-sextet rule: assessment from polycyclic conjugated hydrocarbons

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Exploring the validity of the Glidewell–Lloyd extension of Clar’s π-sextet rule: assessment from polycyclic conjugated hydrocarbons
Published in
Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00214-016-1970-1
Authors

Ouissam El Bakouri, Jordi Poater, Ferran Feixas, Miquel Solà

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Mexico 1 4%
Ukraine 1 4%
Unknown 21 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 46%
Computer Science 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2017.
All research outputs
#13,403,436
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#307
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,692
of 371,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Chemistry Accounts
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.