↓ Skip to main content

Factors influencing the implementation of a lifestyle counseling program in patients with venous leg ulcers: a multiple case study

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Factors influencing the implementation of a lifestyle counseling program in patients with venous leg ulcers: a multiple case study
Published in
Implementation Science, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-7-104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irene M van de Glind, Maud M Heinen, Andrea W Evers, Michel Wensing, Theo van Achterberg

Abstract

Implementation of lifestyle interventions in patient care is a major challenge. Understanding factors that influence implementation is a first step in programs to enhance uptake of these interventions. A lifestyle-counseling intervention, Lively Legs, delivered by trained nurses, can effectively improve the lifestyle in patients with venous leg ulcers. The aim of this study was to identify factors that hindered or facilitated implementation of this intervention in outpatient dermatology clinics and in home care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 26%
Psychology 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2012.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,410
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,052
of 201,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#22
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.