↓ Skip to main content

Safety of a DVT Chemoprophylaxis Protocol Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single Center Quality Improvement Initiative

Overview of attention for article published in Neurocritical Care, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Safety of a DVT Chemoprophylaxis Protocol Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single Center Quality Improvement Initiative
Published in
Neurocritical Care, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12028-012-9786-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher M. Nickele, Timothy K. Kamps, Joshua E. Medow

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a complication that affects approximately 30 % of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients when pharmacologic prophylaxis is not used. Following TBI, specifically in the case of contusions, the safety and efficacy of pharmacologic thromboembolism prophylaxis (PTP) has been studied only in small sample sizes. In this study, we attempt to assess the safety and efficacy of a PTP protocol for TBI patients, as a quality improvement (QI) initiative, in the neuroscience intensive care unit (NSICU).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Other 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 47%
Psychology 6 6%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Unspecified 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2015.
All research outputs
#13,370,975
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#905
of 1,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,160
of 183,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.