| Title |
A review of mixing and propulsion of chyme in the small intestine: fresh insights from new methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00360-015-0889-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. G. Lentle, C. de Loubens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 65 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,869,909
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#66
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,656
of 361,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them