↓ Skip to main content

Activity Pacing, Avoidance, Endurance, and Associations With Patient Functioning in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Activity Pacing, Avoidance, Endurance, and Associations With Patient Functioning in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, June 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole E Andrews, Jenny Strong, Pamela J Meredith

Abstract

To systematically review the associations between different approaches to activity (ie, activity pacing, avoidance, or endurance) and indicators of patient functioning in chronic pain samples.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 256 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 61 23%
Unknown 49 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 19%
Psychology 45 17%
Sports and Recreations 9 3%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 64 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,568,560
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#316
of 6,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,784
of 177,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#5
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.