↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Evaluation of Three TSPO PET Radiotracers in a LPS-Induced Model of Mild Neuroinflammation in Rats

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Imaging and Biology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Comparative Evaluation of Three TSPO PET Radiotracers in a LPS-Induced Model of Mild Neuroinflammation in Rats
Published in
Molecular Imaging and Biology, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11307-016-0984-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sujata Sridharan, Francois-Xavier Lepelletier, William Trigg, Samuel Banister, Tristan Reekie, Michael Kassiou, Alexander Gerhard, Rainer Hinz, Hervé Boutin

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, neuroinflammation (NI) has increasingly been recognised as having an important role in  many neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease. As such, being able to image NI non-invasively in patients is critical to monitor pathological processes and potential therapies targeting neuroinflammation. The translocator protein (TSPO) has proven a reliable NI biomarker for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. However, if TSPO imaging in acute conditions such as stroke provides strong and reliable signals, TSPO imaging in neurodegenerative diseases has proven more challenging. Here, we report results comparing the recently developed TSPO tracers [(18)F]GE-180 and [(18)F]DPA-714 with (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 in a rodent model of subtle focal inflammation. Adult male Wistar rats were stereotactically injected with 1 μg lipopolysaccharide in the right striatum. Three days later, animals underwent a 60-min PET scan with (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 and [(18)F]GE-180 (n = 6) or [(18)F]DPA-714 (n = 6). Ten animals were scanned with either [(18)F]GE-180 (n = 5) or [(18)F]DPA-714 (n = 5) only. Kinetic analysis of PET data was performed using the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) with a contralateral reference region or a novel data-driven input to estimate binding potential BPND. Autoradiography and immunohistochemistry were performed to confirm in vivo results. At 40-60 min post-injection, [(18)F]GE-180 dual-scanned animals showed a significantly increased core/contralateral uptake ratio vs. the same animals scanned with (R)-[(11)C]PK11195 (3.41 ± 1.09 vs. 2.43 ± 0.39, p = 0.03); [(18)]DPA-714 did not (2.80 ± 0.69 vs. 2.26 ± 0.41). Kinetic modelling with a contralateral reference region identified significantly higher binding potential (BPND) in the core of the LPS injection site with [(18)F]GE-180 but not with [(18)F]DPA-714 vs. (R)-[(11)C]PK11195. A cerebellar reference region and novel data-driven input to the SRTM were unable to distinguish differences in tracer BPND. Second-generation TSPO-PET tracers are able to accurately detect mild-level NI. In this model, [(18)F]GE-180 shows a higher core/contralateral ratio and BPND when compared to (R)-[(11)C]PK11195, while [(18)F]DPA-714 did not.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Master 12 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Neuroscience 14 17%
Chemistry 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,561,046
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#53
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,794
of 381,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Imaging and Biology
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.