↓ Skip to main content

健常者における飴舐め訓練による口腔機能向上に関する効果の検証

Overview of attention for article published in Ronen Shika Igaku, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
健常者における飴舐め訓練による口腔機能向上に関する効果の検証
Published in
Ronen Shika Igaku, December 2018
DOI 10.11259/jsg.33.366
Authors

森野 智子, 戸畑 温子, 溝口 奈菜

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2021.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Ronen Shika Igaku
#66
of 88 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340,804
of 445,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ronen Shika Igaku
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.