↓ Skip to main content

The Pipeline Still Leaks and More Than You Think: A Status Report on Gender Diversity in Biomedical Engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
The Pipeline Still Leaks and More Than You Think: A Status Report on Gender Diversity in Biomedical Engineering
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10439-010-9958-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naomi C. Chesler, Gilda Barabino, Sangeeta N. Bhatia, Rebecca Richards-Kortum

Abstract

While the percentage of women in biomedical engineering is higher than in many other technical fields, it is far from being in proportion to the US population. The decrease in the proportion of women and underrepresented minorities in biomedical engineering from the bachelors to the masters to the doctoral levels is evidence of a still leaky pipeline in our discipline. In addition, the percentage of women faculty members at the assistant, associate and full professor levels remain disappointingly low even after years of improved recruitment of women into biomedical engineering at the undergraduate level. Worse, the percentage of women graduating with undergraduate degrees in biomedical engineering has been decreasing nationwide for the most recent three year span for which national data are available. Increasing diversity in biomedical engineering is predicted to have significant research and educational benefits. The barriers to women's success in biomedical engineering and strategies for overcoming these obstacles-and fixing the leaks in the pipeline-are reviewed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
India 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 124 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 27%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Professor 9 7%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 32 24%
Social Sciences 21 16%
Psychology 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 27 20%