Title |
Prevalence and incidence density rates of chronic comorbidity in type 2 diabetes patients: an exploratory cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-10-128 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hilde Luijks, Tjard Schermer, Hans Bor, Chris van Weel, Toine Lagro-Janssen, Marion Biermans, Wim de Grauw |
Abstract |
Evidence-based diabetes guidelines generally neglect comorbidity, which may interfere with diabetes management. The prevalence of comorbidity described in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) shows a wide range depending on the population selected and the comorbid diseases studied. This exploratory study aimed to establish comorbidity rates in an unselected primary-care population of patients with T2D. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Italy | 1 | 13% |
Germany | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 89 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 22% |
Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Psychology | 5 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2012.
All research outputs
#5,571,418
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,227
of 3,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,564
of 183,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#44
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.