↓ Skip to main content

Frequency of brain metastases from prostate cancer: an 18-year single-institution experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Frequency of brain metastases from prostate cancer: an 18-year single-institution experience
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11060-012-0994-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Orazio Caffo, Antonello Veccia, Gianni Fellin, Salvatore Mussari, Lucianna Russo, Luigi Tomio, Enzo Galligioni

Abstract

It has recently been reported that the incidence of brain metastases (BMs) from prostate cancer (PC) has increased in comparison with historical series. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of BMs in the pre- and post-docetaxel era in a single institution in which all oncological patients are referred to one Radiotherapy and one Medical Oncology Department. We searched the electronic databases of these departments for all males with BMs entered from 1994 to 2011. The year of the introduction of docetaxel into clinical practice (2002) divided the observation period into two 9-year periods: period 1 (P1) from 1994 until 2002 (P1), and period 2 (P2) after 2002. The number of patients with BMs was constant: 241 patients in P1 and 249 in P2. The greatest changes in frequency between P1 and P2 involved colorectal cancer (+75.9 %), renal cancer (+141.9 %), and PC (+238.7 %). The total number of patients with BMs from PC was nine: two in P1 (0.8 %) and seven in P2 (2.8 %). All but two of these patients developed BMs after becoming castration-resistant. Median BM-free survival was 36 months, whereas median BM survival was 8 weeks. As the appearance of BMs in the natural history of PC is usually related to the late phase of the disease, and mortality due to PC remained constant, it seems that there really has been an increase in the frequency of BMs from PC that may reflect a gain in survival.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Unspecified 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 45%
Unspecified 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,171,868
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2,556
of 2,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,380
of 183,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,955 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.