↓ Skip to main content

Parasite invasion following host reintroduction: a case study of Yellowstone's wolves

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parasite invasion following host reintroduction: a case study of Yellowstone's wolves
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2012
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2011.0369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily S. Almberg, Paul C. Cross, Andrew P. Dobson, Douglas W. Smith, Peter J. Hudson

Abstract

Wildlife reintroductions select or treat individuals for good health with the expectation that these individuals will fare better than infected animals. However, these individuals, new to their environment, may also be particularly susceptible to circulating infections and this may result in high morbidity and mortality, potentially jeopardizing the goals of recovery. Here, using the reintroduction of the grey wolf (Canis lupus) into Yellowstone National Park as a case study, we address the question of how parasites invade a reintroduced population and consider the impact of these invasions on population performance. We find that several viral parasites rapidly invaded the population inside the park, likely via spillover from resident canid species, and we contrast these with the slower invasion of sarcoptic mange, caused by the mite Sarcoptes scabiei. The spatio-temporal patterns of mange invasion were largely consistent with patterns of host connectivity and density, and we demonstrate that the area of highest resource quality, supporting the greatest density of wolves, is also the region that appears most susceptible to repeated disease invasion and parasite-induced declines. The success of wolf reintroduction appears not to have been jeopardized by infectious disease, but now shows signs of regulation or limitation modulated by parasites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Brazil 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 283 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 20%
Student > Master 45 15%
Student > Bachelor 45 15%
Other 20 7%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 32 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 164 53%
Environmental Science 44 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 25 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 40 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,132,838
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1,004
of 7,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,816
of 194,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#7
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.