You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bayesian refinement of association signals for 14 loci in 3 common diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.2435 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julian B Maller, Gilean McVean, Jake Byrnes, Damjan Vukcevic, Kimmo Palin, Zhan Su, Joanna M M Howson, Adam Auton, Simon Myers, Andrew Morris, Matti Pirinen, Matthew A Brown, Paul R Burton, Mark J Caulfield, Alastair Compston, Martin Farrall, Alistair S Hall, Andrew T Hattersley, Adrian V S Hill, Christopher G Mathew, Marcus Pembrey, Jack Satsangi, Michael R Stratton, Jane Worthington, Nick Craddock, Matthew Hurles, Willem Ouwehand, Miles Parkes, Nazneen Rahman, Audrey Duncanson, John A Todd, Dominic P Kwiatkowski, Nilesh J Samani, Stephen C L Gough, Mark I McCarthy, Panagiotis Deloukas, Peter Donnelly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Peru | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 381 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 109 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 24 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 72 | 18% |
| Unknown | 41 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 137 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 99 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 25 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 6% |
| Unknown | 57 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,631,331
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#3,130
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,551
of 205,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#34
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.