↓ Skip to main content

Describing the Use of the Internet for Health, Physical Activity, and Nutrition Information in Pregnant Women

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
Describing the Use of the Internet for Health, Physical Activity, and Nutrition Information in Pregnant Women
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10995-012-1160-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Huberty, Danae Dinkel, Michael W. Beets, Jason Coleman

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine how pregnant women in the Midwestern United States use the internet for health information during pregnancy including information related to physical activity and nutrition, and to determine the impact of the internet on women's confidence in making decisions about physical activity participation and eating behaviors during pregnancy. This was a descriptive, exploratory study using a convenient, non-probabilistic sample. Women were recruited through handouts provided in person, fliers posted at venues, or local websites that cater to women who are pregnant or up to 1 year post-partum. Overall, 293 women (28.5 years ± 4.9) completed the survey online (Survey Monkey) or in-print. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired t tests, and analyses of covariance. Almost all women used the internet for health information during their pregnancy. Half of women used the internet for information related to physical activity during their pregnancy and some increased their physical activity as a result. Women reported an increase in their confidence for making decisions related to physical activity during pregnancy after using the internet for physical activity information. Women that reported increases in physical activity during pregnancy, had greater increases in confidence for making decisions from using the internet compared to women who decreased or did not change their physical activity. Findings related to nutrition were similar to physical activity. However, there were no significant differences in increases in confidence between those who did or did not change the foods they ate. This study provides health promotional professionals useful information to consider when designing future physical activity and/or nutrition interventions for pregnant women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Israel 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 210 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Researcher 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 65 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 13%
Social Sciences 20 9%
Psychology 18 8%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 68 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2012.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#1,433
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,257
of 186,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#23
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.