| Title |
Standardizing integration of palliative care into comprehensive cancer therapy—a disease specific approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-011-1131-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Gaertner, Juergen Wolf, Michael Hallek, Jan-Peter Glossmann, Raymond Voltz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 16% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,486,175
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,869
of 4,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,617
of 108,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.