You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The World Report on Disability as a blueprint for international, national, and local aphasia services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Speech Language Pathology, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3109/17549507.2012.721004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda E. Worrall, Tami Howe, Anna O'Callaghan, Anne J. Hill, Miranda Rose, Sarah J. Wallace, Tanya Rose, Kyla Brown, Emma Power, Robyn O'Halloran, Alexia Rohde |
| Abstract |
This commentary aims to extend the debate of the lead article authors (Wylie, McAllister, Davidson, and Marshall, 2013) by translating the nine recommendations of the World Report on Disability into a plan of action for the aphasia community. Solutions for the advancement of aphasia science and services are presented at international (macro), national (meso), and local (micro) levels. Implications for speech-language pathologists and aphasia service delivery are discussed. An overarching call to action is the need for speech-language pathologists to support a strong and vibrant aphasia community at all levels, so that the voices of people with aphasia can be heard. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 22% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 16% |
| Psychology | 6 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2015.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Speech Language Pathology
#592
of 832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,081
of 202,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Speech Language Pathology
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.