↓ Skip to main content

Nanoparticle-Based Medicines: A Review of FDA-Approved Materials and Clinical Trials to Date

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Research, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 3,134)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
18 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2005 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2474 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nanoparticle-Based Medicines: A Review of FDA-Approved Materials and Clinical Trials to Date
Published in
Pharmaceutical Research, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11095-016-1958-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Bobo, Kye J. Robinson, Jiaul Islam, Kristofer J. Thurecht, Simon R. Corrie

Abstract

In this review we provide an up to date snapshot of nanomedicines either currently approved by the US FDA, or in the FDA clinical trials process. We define nanomedicines as therapeutic or imaging agents which comprise a nanoparticle in order to control the biodistribution, enhance the efficacy, or otherwise reduce toxicity of a drug or biologic. We identified 51 FDA-approved nanomedicines that met this definition and 77 products in clinical trials, with ~40% of trials listed in clinicaltrials.gov started in 2014 or 2015. While FDA approved materials are heavily weighted to polymeric, liposomal, and nanocrystal formulations, there is a trend towards the development of more complex materials comprising micelles, protein-based NPs, and also the emergence of a variety of inorganic and metallic particles in clinical trials. We then provide an overview of the different material categories represented in our search, highlighting nanomedicines that have either been recently approved, or are already in clinical trials. We conclude with some comments on future perspectives for nanomedicines, which we expect to include more actively-targeted materials, multi-functional materials ("theranostics") and more complicated materials that blur the boundaries of traditional material categories. A key challenge for researchers, industry, and regulators is how to classify new materials and what additional testing (e.g. safety and toxicity) is required before products become available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,474 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2464 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 558 23%
Student > Master 340 14%
Student > Bachelor 258 10%
Researcher 244 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 138 6%
Other 288 12%
Unknown 648 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 354 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 310 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 254 10%
Engineering 157 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 145 6%
Other 471 19%
Unknown 783 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,297,868
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#30
of 3,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,014
of 374,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#3
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.