You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shaping the directionality of sustainability transitions: the diverging development patterns of solar photovoltaics in two Chinese provinces
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Regional Studies, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1080/00343404.2021.1903412 |
| Authors |
Kejia Yang, Johan Schot, Bernhard Truffer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 29% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 54% |
| Scientists | 8 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,414,922
of 24,362,308 outputs
Outputs from Regional Studies
#243
of 1,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,597
of 429,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Studies
#12
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,362,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.