↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of 27 Y-chromosomal STR haplotypes in a Han population of Henan province, Central China

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of 27 Y-chromosomal STR haplotypes in a Han population of Henan province, Central China
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00414-016-1326-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rufeng Bai, Yaju Liu, Juntao Zhang, Meisen Shi, Hongmei Dong, Shuhua Ma, R. F. Bai, MS. Shi

Abstract

A total of 1225 unrelated Han males from Henan province were analyzed with the prototype Yfiler® Plus kit (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The calculated gene diversity (GD) values ranged from 0.3855 to 0.9673 for the DYS391 and DYS385a/b loci, respectively. The discriminatory capacity (DC) was 86.94 % with 1065 observed haplotypes using 17 Yfiler loci, by the addition of 10 Y-STRs to the Yfiler® Plus system, the DC was increased to 98.94 % while showing 1212 observed haplotypes. Among the new incorporated Y-STRs, DYS576, DYF387S1, DYS518, DYS627, and DYS449 were major contributors to enhancing discrimination. In the analysis of molecular variance, the Henan Han population clustered with Asian origin populations and showed significant differences from other reference populations. In this study, the improvement of adding additional Y-STR markers with the Yfiler® Plus kit provided substantially stronger discriminatory power in the Henan Han population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 26%
Unspecified 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#13,241,425
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#684
of 2,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,138
of 298,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,072 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.