↓ Skip to main content

The Success of Acinetobacter Species; Genetic, Metabolic and Virulence Attributes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Success of Acinetobacter Species; Genetic, Metabolic and Virulence Attributes
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0046984
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anton Y. Peleg, Anna de Breij, Mark D. Adams, Gustavo M. Cerqueira, Stefano Mocali, Marco Galardini, Peter H. Nibbering, Ashlee M. Earl, Doyle V. Ward, David L. Paterson, Harald Seifert, Lenie Dijkshoorn

Abstract

An understanding of why certain Acinetobacter species are more successful in causing nosocomial infections, transmission and epidemic spread in healthcare institutions compared with other species is lacking. We used genomic, phenotypic and virulence studies to identify differences between Acinetobacter species. Fourteen strains representing nine species were examined. Genomic analysis of six strains showed that the A. baumannii core genome contains many genes important for diverse metabolism and survival in the host. Most of the A. baumannii core genes were also present in one or more of the less clinically successful species. In contrast, when the accessory genome of an individual A. baumannii strain was compared to a strain of a less successful species (A. calcoaceticus RUH2202), many operons with putative virulence function were found to be present only in the A. baumannii strain, including the csu operon, the acinetobactin chromosomal cluster, and bacterial defence mechanisms. Phenotype microarray analysis showed that compared to A. calcoaceticus (RUH2202), A. baumannii ATCC 19606(T) was able to utilise nitrogen sources more effectively and was more tolerant to pH, osmotic and antimicrobial stress. Virulence differences were also observed, with A. baumannii ATCC 19606(T), A. pittii SH024, and A. nosocomialis RUH2624 persisting and forming larger biofilms on human skin than A. calcoaceticus. A. baumannii ATCC 19606(T) and A. pittii SH024 were also able to survive in a murine thigh infection model, whereas the other two species were eradicated. The current study provides important insights into the elucidation of differences in clinical relevance among Acinetobacter species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 232 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 16%
Researcher 37 15%
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 10%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 42 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 10%
Chemistry 7 3%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 49 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,670,096
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,343
of 193,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,553
of 183,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,347
of 4,819 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,819 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.