You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why Internal Moral Enhancement Might Be politically Better than External Moral Enhancement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroethics, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12152-016-9273-8 |
| Authors |
John Danaher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 23% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 12 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,124,090
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#341
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,962
of 367,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.