| Title |
Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the lung
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, May 1993
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01146169 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiroshi Seto, Tomoko Ohkubo, Takako Kanoh, Morio Koike, Kyoji Nakamura, Yutaka Kawahara |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 29% |
| Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 2 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 14% |
| Engineering | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,787,159
of 25,381,151 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#149
of 2,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,193
of 19,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.