| Title |
Phase II trial of neoadjuvant letrozole and lapatinib in Asian postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer [Neo-ALL-IN]: Highlighting the TILs, ER expressional change after neoadjuvant treatment, and FES-PET as potential significant biomarkers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00280-016-3107-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ji Hyun Park, Myung Joo Kang, Jin-Hee Ahn, Jeong Eun Kim, Kyung Hae Jung, Gyungyub Gong, Hee Jin Lee, Byung-Ho Son, Sei-Hyun Ahn, Hak-Hee Kim, Hee Jung Shin, Dae-Hyuk Moon, Sung-Bae Kim |
| Abstract |
Neo-ALL-IN (NCT 01275859) is a single-center, phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of neoadjuvant letrozole plus lapatinib, as well as potential biomarkers, in postmenopausal women with ER- and HER2-positive (ER+HER2+) breast cancer. Postmenopausal ER+HER2+ breast cancer of stages II-III was eligible. Daily 2.5 mg letrozole plus 1500 mg lapatinib were administered for 18-21 weeks before surgery. Clinical responses were assessed by palpation with caliper, breast ultrasonography, mammogram, and/or MRI. Biologic samples were collected for biomarker analyses at three time points (baseline, day 14, and before surgery). Baseline fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose and fluorine-18 fluoroestradiol PET-CT scans were performed. Among 24 patients enrolled, 17 (70.8 %) completed planned neoadjuvant treatment, whereas 7 prematurely terminated the treatment and proceeded to surgery because of toxicity or progression; 2 patients showed definite progression, and 2 showed clinical regrowth by palpation regardless of minimal response. All patients eventually underwent breast cancer surgery. Toxicities were generally mild mostly within grades 1-2 except prolonged or recurrent grade 3 liver toxicities in 3 patients (13.6 %) regardless of sequential dose reduction, which finally led to discontinuation of treatment. The overall clinical response rates were 62.5 % (n = 15) including 1 CR in breast. However, no pathologic CR (ypT0-is N0) was achieved. SUVmax lower than 5.5 in baseline FES PET-CT (p = 0.007), baseline TILs over 20 % (p = 0.026), and decreased IHC ER Allred score after neoadjuvant treatment (p = 0.021) were significantly associated with adverse clinical response. When this chemo-free, combination neoadjuvant therapy with letrozole and lapatinib is given for Asian postmenopausal ER+HER2+ breast cancer, TILs, change of ER expression following neoadjuvant treatment, and SUVmax in baseline FES-PET are to be considered potential biomarkers in these patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#19,221,261
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#2,044
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,107
of 371,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.