| Title |
Telehealthcare for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Cochrane Review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp12x658269 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susannah McLean, Ulugbek Nurmatov, Joseph L Y Liu, Claudia Pagliari, Josip Car, Aziz Sheikh |
| Abstract |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is common. Telehealthcare, involving personalised health care over a distance, is seen as having the potential to improve care for people with COPD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 27% |
| Belgium | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 299 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 23% |
| Researcher | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 17% |
| Unknown | 67 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Engineering | 14 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 56 | 18% |
| Unknown | 76 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#914,301
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#420
of 4,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,465
of 184,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#3
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.