| Title |
Point-of-care INR coagulometers for self-management of oral anticoagulation: primary care diagnostic technology update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp12x658476 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annette Plüddemann, Matthew Thompson, Jane Wolstenholme, Christopher P Price, Carl Heneghan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 39% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,710,268
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,923
of 4,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,974
of 184,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#16
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.