↓ Skip to main content

Application of the molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction to the organophosphate residues determination in strawberries

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Application of the molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction to the organophosphate residues determination in strawberries
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00216-012-6327-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabela Mendes Baldim, Marília Cristina de Oliveira Souza, João Carlos Jacinto da Cunha Souza, Eduardo Costa Figueiredo, Isarita Martins

Abstract

This study describe an analytical method employing gas chromatography (GC) using flame photometric detection that has been developed for the simultaneous determination of organophosphate pesticides (diazinon, disulfoton, parathion, chlorpyrifos and malathion) in strawberry samples. For this purpose, molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction was applied as a sample preparation technique. The method was linear in the ranges from 0.10 to 1.00 μg g(-1), for diazinon, disulfoton, parathion and chlorpyrifos, and 0.10 to 2.00 μg g(-1) for malathion with r > 0.99. The detection limits (LD) ranged from 0.02 to 0.05 μg g(-1). Recovery studies yielded average recoveries in the range of 65.25 to 87.70 %. These results showed the potential of this technique for organophosphate residue monitoring in strawberry samples.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 19%
Other 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,858
of 9,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,132
of 187,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#18
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,618 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.