↓ Skip to main content

A 1.35 Mb DNA fragment is inserted into the DHMN1 locus on chromosome 7q34–q36.2

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
A 1.35 Mb DNA fragment is inserted into the DHMN1 locus on chromosome 7q34–q36.2
Published in
Human Genetics, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00439-016-1720-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander P. Drew, Anthony N. Cutrupi, Megan H. Brewer, Garth A. Nicholson, Marina L. Kennerson

Abstract

Distal hereditary motor neuropathies predominantly affect the motor neurons of the peripheral nervous system leading to chronic disability. Using whole genome sequencing (WGS) we have identified a novel structural variation (SV) within the distal hereditary motor neuropathy locus on chromosome 7q34-q36.2 (DHMN1). The SV involves the insertion of a 1.35 Mb DNA fragment into the DHMN1 disease locus. The source of the inserted sequence is 2.3 Mb distal to the disease locus at chromosome 7q36.3. The insertion involves the duplication of five genes (LOC389602, RNF32, LMBR1, NOM1, MNX1) and partial duplication of UBE3C. The genomic structure of genes within the DHMN1 locus are not disrupted by the insertion and no disease causing point mutations within the locus were identified. This suggests the novel SV is the most likely DNA mutation disrupting the DHMN1 locus. Due to the size and position of the DNA insertion, the gene(s) directly affected by the genomic re-arrangement remains elusive. Our finding represents a new genetic cause for hereditary motor neuropathies and highlights the growing importance of interrogating the non-coding genome for SV mutations in families which have been excluded for genome wide coding mutations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Unspecified 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Unspecified 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,381,002
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,541
of 2,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,141
of 367,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.