↓ Skip to main content

The Influence of Pastors’ Ideologies of Homosexuality on HIV Prevention in the Black Church

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Religion and Health, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
The Influence of Pastors’ Ideologies of Homosexuality on HIV Prevention in the Black Church
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10943-016-0243-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Quinn, Julia Dickson-Gomez, Staci Young

Abstract

Young, Black men who have sex with men (YBMSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV, and Black Churches may be a source of stigma which can exacerbate HIV risk and contribute to negative health and psychosocial outcomes. Findings from this study are based on 21 semi-structured interviews with pastors and ethnographic observation in six Black Churches. Interview transcripts and field notes were analyzed in MAXQDA using thematic content analysis. Although pastors espoused messages of love and acceptance, they overwhelmingly believed homosexuality was a sin and had difficulty accepting YBMSM into their churches. The tension around homosexuality limited pastors' involvement in HIV prevention efforts, although there still may be opportunities for some churches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 29%
Social Sciences 14 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,425,138
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#308
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,288
of 302,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.