↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the binding characteristics of [18F]THK-523 and other amyloid imaging tracers to Alzheimer’s disease pathology

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of the binding characteristics of [18F]THK-523 and other amyloid imaging tracers to Alzheimer’s disease pathology
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00259-012-2261-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryuichi Harada, Nobuyuki Okamura, Shozo Furumoto, Tetsuro Tago, Masahiro Maruyama, Makoto Higuchi, Takeo Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki Arai, Ren Iwata, Yukitsuka Kudo, Kazuhiko Yanai

Abstract

Extensive deposition of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain is a pathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although several PET imaging agents have been developed for in vivo detection of senile plaques, no PET probe is currently available for selective detection of neurofibrillary tangles in the living human brain. Recently, [(18)F]THK-523 was developed as a potential in vivo imaging probe for tau pathology. The purpose of this study was to compare the binding properties of [(18)F]THK-523 and other amyloid imaging agents, including PiB, BF-227 and FDDNP, to synthetic protein fibrils and human brain tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
France 2 3%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 71 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 24%
Chemistry 13 17%
Neuroscience 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,900,361
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#586
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,612
of 184,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.