↓ Skip to main content

Economic growth, urbanization, globalization, and the risks of emerging infectious diseases in China: A review

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
203 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
384 Mendeley
Title
Economic growth, urbanization, globalization, and the risks of emerging infectious diseases in China: A review
Published in
Ambio, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0809-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tong Wu, Charles Perrings, Ann Kinzig, James P. Collins, Ben A. Minteer, Peter Daszak

Abstract

Three interrelated world trends may be exacerbating emerging zoonotic risks: income growth, urbanization, and globalization. Income growth is associated with rising animal protein consumption in developing countries, which increases the conversion of wild lands to livestock production, and hence the probability of zoonotic emergence. Urbanization implies the greater concentration and connectedness of people, which increases the speed at which new infections are spread. Globalization-the closer integration of the world economy-has facilitated pathogen spread among countries through the growth of trade and travel. High-risk areas for the emergence and spread of infectious disease are where these three trends intersect with predisposing socioecological conditions including the presence of wild disease reservoirs, agricultural practices that increase contact between wildlife and livestock, and cultural practices that increase contact between humans, wildlife, and livestock. Such an intersection occurs in China, which has been a "cradle" of zoonoses from the Black Death to avian influenza and SARS. Disease management in China is thus critical to the mitigation of global zoonotic risks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 382 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 14%
Student > Bachelor 50 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 9%
Researcher 32 8%
Student > Postgraduate 19 5%
Other 65 17%
Unknown 133 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 9%
Social Sciences 30 8%
Environmental Science 24 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 18 5%
Other 110 29%
Unknown 146 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#808,929
of 24,394,175 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#114
of 1,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,553
of 374,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,394,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.