↓ Skip to main content

汎神論と物神論

Overview of attention for article published in The Bulletin of Kubikino Institute of Folk-Archive, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
汎神論と物神論
Published in
The Bulletin of Kubikino Institute of Folk-Archive, July 2020
DOI 10.32257/kfa.5.13_1
Authors

石塚 正英

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,483,234
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from The Bulletin of Kubikino Institute of Folk-Archive
#25
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,523
of 432,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Bulletin of Kubikino Institute of Folk-Archive
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.