↓ Skip to main content

Comparing sample bias correction methods for species distribution modeling using virtual species

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosphere, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing sample bias correction methods for species distribution modeling using virtual species
Published in
Ecosphere, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/ecs2.3422
Authors

Richard Inman, Janet Franklin, Todd Esque, Kenneth Nussear

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 36%
Environmental Science 19 21%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,269,566
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Ecosphere
#1,670
of 3,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,648
of 453,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosphere
#62
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.