↓ Skip to main content

Sexuality and intimacy in assisted living: Residents’ perspectives and experiences

Overview of attention for article published in Sexuality Research and Social Policy, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Sexuality and intimacy in assisted living: Residents’ perspectives and experiences
Published in
Sexuality Research and Social Policy, December 2009
DOI 10.1525/srsp.2009.6.4.25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann Christine Frankowski, Leanne J. Clark

Abstract

The assisted living industry provides residential, medical, nutritional, functional, and social services for approximately 1 million older adults in the United States. Despite their holistic approach to person-centered care and their emphasis on a consumer-empowered, social environment, assisted living providers pay scant attention to clients' sexual needs. In this article, the authors discuss the realities of sex and intimacy in assisted living from the perspectives of residents, families, managers, and staff, exploring the discourse of sexuality, the impact of institutional structure and the role of oversight on sexual attitudes and behaviors, and the relationship of assisted living industry values to residents' sexual expression. Also presented are practical recommendations and policy implications for addressing the sexual and intimacy needs of current and future cohorts of assisted living residents. Data for this article were drawn from 3 National Institute on Aging-funded ethnographic studies conducted in 13 assisted living settings over 9 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 24%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 26 28%
Psychology 19 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,604,484
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Sexuality Research and Social Policy
#74
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,913
of 171,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sexuality Research and Social Policy
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them