You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of a Proactive Mail-Based Alcohol Internet Intervention for University Students: Dismantling the Assessment and Feedback Components in a Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2196/jmir.2062 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Preben Bendtsen, Jim McCambridge, Marcus Bendtsen, Nadine Karlsson, Per Nilsen |
| Abstract |
University students in Sweden routinely receive proactive mail-based alcohol Internet interventions sent from student health services. This intervention provides personalized normative feedback on alcohol consumption with suggestions on how to decrease drinking. Earlier feasibility trials by our group and others have examined effectiveness in simple parallel-groups designs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Belgium | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 25% |
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 42 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,996,363
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#2,430
of 7,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,650
of 202,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#34
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.