↓ Skip to main content

Don Ihde: Heidegger’s technologies: Postphenomenological perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Continental Philosophy Review, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 205)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Don Ihde: Heidegger’s technologies: Postphenomenological perspectives
Published in
Continental Philosophy Review, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11007-012-9215-z
Authors

Robert C. Scharff

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 46%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 3 23%
Computer Science 3 23%
Philosophy 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2012.
All research outputs
#12,863,576
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Continental Philosophy Review
#50
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,449
of 161,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Continental Philosophy Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them