↓ Skip to main content

Continuous time random walks for the evolution of Lagrangian velocities

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Fluids, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous time random walks for the evolution of Lagrangian velocities
Published in
Physical Review Fluids, November 2016
DOI 10.1103/physrevfluids.1.074004
Authors

Marco Dentz, Peter K. Kang, Alessandro Comolli, Tanguy Le Borgne, Daniel R. Lester

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 29%
Engineering 10 20%
Physics and Astronomy 6 12%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2016.
All research outputs
#19,947,956
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Fluids
#1,366
of 2,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,421
of 415,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Fluids
#13
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.