↓ Skip to main content

Hide and seek: tell-tale signs of breast cancer lurking in the blood

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Hide and seek: tell-tale signs of breast cancer lurking in the blood
Published in
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10555-012-9414-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

David S. Guttery, Kevin Blighe, Karen Page, Stephanie D. Marchese, Allison Hills, R. Charles Coombes, Justin Stebbing, Jacqueline A. Shaw

Abstract

Breast cancer treatment is improving due to the introduction of new drugs, guided by molecular testing of the primary tumour for mutations/oncogenic drivers (e.g. HER2 gene amplification). However, tumour tissue is not always available for molecular analysis, intra-tumoural heterogeneity is common and the "cancer genome" is known to evolve with time, particularly following treatment as resistance develops. After resection, those patients with only residual micrometastases are likely to be cured but those with radiologically detectable overt disease are not. Thus, the discovery of blood test(s) that could (1) alert clinicians to early primary or recurrent disease and (2) monitor response to treatment could impact significantly on mortality. Towards this, we and others have focused on molecular profiling of circulating nucleic acids isolated from plasma, both cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and microRNAs, and the relationship of these to circulating tumour cells (CTCs). This review considers the utility of each as circulating biomarkers in breast cancer with particular emphasis on the bioinformatic tools available to support molecular profiling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 47 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2012.
All research outputs
#14,154,868
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#581
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,431
of 183,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.