↓ Skip to main content

“Should It Be Considered Plagiarism?” Student Perceptions of Complex Citation Issues

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Academic Ethics, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
“Should It Be Considered Plagiarism?” Student Perceptions of Complex Citation Issues
Published in
Journal of Academic Ethics, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10805-015-9250-6
Authors

Dan Childers, Sam Bruton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Researcher 9 8%
Lecturer 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 33 29%
Unknown 31 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 17%
Arts and Humanities 18 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 11%
Linguistics 8 7%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 32 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2016.
All research outputs
#12,668,839
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Academic Ethics
#133
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,386
of 390,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Academic Ethics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.