| Title |
Acid-tolerant plant species screened for rehabilitating acid mine drainage sites
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Soils and Sediments, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11368-015-1128-0 |
| Authors |
Ling Ma, Xingquan Rao, Ping Lu, Shaowei Huang, Xiaoyang Chen, Zhihong Xu, Jun Xie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 17% |
| Engineering | 4 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,272,753
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Soils and Sediments
#86
of 507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,303
of 267,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Soils and Sediments
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 507 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.