| Title |
Sediment source tracing with stratified sampling and weightings based on spatial gradients in soil erosion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Soils and Sediments, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11368-015-1134-2 |
| Authors |
Scott N. Wilkinson, Jon M. Olley, Takahisa Furuichi, Joanne Burton, Anne E. Kinsey-Henderson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 22 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,272,753
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Soils and Sediments
#86
of 507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,432
of 268,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Soils and Sediments
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 507 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.