↓ Skip to main content

The paradox of extreme high-altitude migration in bar-headed geese Anser indicus

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The paradox of extreme high-altitude migration in bar-headed geese Anser indicus
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, January 2013
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2012.2114
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. A. Hawkes, S. Balachandran, N. Batbayar, P. J. Butler, B. Chua, D. C. Douglas, P. B. Frappell, Y. Hou, W. K. Milsom, S. H. Newman, D. J. Prosser, P. Sathiyaselvam, G. R. Scott, J. Y. Takekawa, T. Natsagdorj, M. Wikelski, M. J. Witt, B. Yan, C. M. Bishop

Abstract

Bar-headed geese are renowned for migratory flights at extremely high altitudes over the world's tallest mountains, the Himalayas, where partial pressure of oxygen is dramatically reduced while flight costs, in terms of rate of oxygen consumption, are greatly increased. Such a mismatch is paradoxical, and it is not clear why geese might fly higher than is absolutely necessary. In addition, direct empirical measurements of high-altitude flight are lacking. We test whether migrating bar-headed geese actually minimize flight altitude and make use of favourable winds to reduce flight costs. By tracking 91 geese, we show that these birds typically travel through the valleys of the Himalayas and not over the summits. We report maximum flight altitudes of 7290 m and 6540 m for southbound and northbound geese, respectively, but with 95 per cent of locations received from less than 5489 m. Geese travelled along a route that was 112 km longer than the great circle (shortest distance) route, with transit ground speeds suggesting that they rarely profited from tailwinds. Bar-headed geese from these eastern populations generally travel only as high as the terrain beneath them dictates and rarely in profitable winds. Nevertheless, their migration represents an enormous challenge in conditions where humans and other mammals are only able to operate at levels well below their sea-level maxima.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 186 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Master 23 12%
Other 12 6%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 37 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 59%
Environmental Science 13 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 38 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#970,306
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2,295
of 11,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,628
of 290,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#7
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.