↓ Skip to main content

An improved non‐Cartesian partially parallel imaging by exploiting artificial sparsity

Overview of attention for article published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An improved non‐Cartesian partially parallel imaging by exploiting artificial sparsity
Published in
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/mrm.26360
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhifeng Chen, Ling Xia, Feng Liu, Qiuliang Wang, Yi Li, Xuchen Zhu, Feng Huang

Abstract

To improve the performance of non-Cartesian partially parallel imaging (PPI) by exploiting artificial sparsity, the generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) operator for wider band lines (GROWL) is taken as a specific example for explanation. This work is based on the GRAPPA-like PPI having an improved performance when the to-be-reconstructed image is sparse in the image domain. A systematic scheme is proposed to artificially generate the sparse image for non-Cartesian trajectory. Using GROWL as a specific non-Cartesian PPI method, artificial sparsity-enhanced GROWL (ARTS-GROWL) is used to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed scheme. The ARTS-GROWL consists of three steps: 1) generating synthetic k-space data corresponding to an image with smaller support, that is, artificial sparsity; 2) applying GROWL to the synthetic k-space data from previous step; and 3) recovering the final image from the reconstruction with the processed data. For simulation and in vivo data, the experiments demonstrate that the proposed ARTS-GROWL significantly reduces the reconstruction errors compared with the conventional GROWL technique for the tested acceleration factors. Taking ARTS-GROWL, for instance, experimental results indicate that artificial sparsity improved the signal-to-noise ratio and normalized root-mean-square error of non-Cartesian PPI. Magn Reson Med, 2016. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 25%
Materials Science 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2016.
All research outputs
#22,012,573
of 24,561,012 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#6,329
of 7,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,994
of 372,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#55
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,561,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,062 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.