↓ Skip to main content

Biomechanics and Physiology of Uphill and Downhill Running

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
91 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
175 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
620 Mendeley
Title
Biomechanics and Physiology of Uphill and Downhill Running
Published in
Sports Medicine, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40279-016-0605-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianluca Vernillo, Marlène Giandolini, W. Brent Edwards, Jean-Benoît Morin, Pierre Samozino, Nicolas Horvais, Guillaume Y. Millet

Abstract

Most running studies have considered level running (LR), yet the regulation of locomotor behaviour during uphill (UR) and downhill (DR) running is fundamental to increase our understanding of human locomotion. The purpose of this article was to review the existing literature regarding biomechanical, neuromuscular and physiological adaptations during graded running. Relative to LR, UR is characterized by a higher step frequency, increased internal mechanical work, shorter swing/aerial phase duration, and greater duty factor, while DR is characterized by increased aerial time, reduced step frequency and decreased duty factor. Grade also modifies foot strike patterns, with a progressive adoption of a mid- to fore-foot strike pattern during UR, and rear-foot strike patterns during DR. In UR, lower limb muscles perform a higher net mechanical work compared to LR and DR to increase the body's potential energy. In DR, energy dissipation is generally prevalent compared to energy generation. The increased demands for work as running incline increases are met by an increase in power output at all joints, particularly the hip. This implies that UR requires greater muscular activity compared to LR and DR. Energy cost of running (C r) linearly increases with positive slope but C r of DR decreases until a minimum slope is reached at -20 %, after which C r increases again. The effects of slope on biomechanics, muscle contraction patterns and physiological responses have important implications for injury prevention and success of athletes engaged in graded running competitions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 620 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 614 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 135 22%
Student > Bachelor 82 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 11%
Researcher 47 8%
Student > Postgraduate 23 4%
Other 99 16%
Unknown 166 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 247 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 6%
Engineering 31 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 3%
Other 46 7%
Unknown 186 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#408,818
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#398
of 2,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,122
of 376,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#11
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.