↓ Skip to main content

Aromatase inhibition remodels the clonal architecture of estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aromatase inhibition remodels the clonal architecture of estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancers
Published in
Nature Communications, August 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms12498
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher A. Miller, Yevgeniy Gindin, Charles Lu, Obi L Griffith, Malachi Griffith, Dong Shen, Jeremy Hoog, Tiandao Li, David E. Larson, Mark Watson, Sherri R Davies, Kelly Hunt, Vera J. Suman, Jacqueline Snider, Thomas Walsh, Graham A. Colditz, Katherine DeSchryver, Richard K. Wilson, Elaine R. Mardis, Matthew J. Ellis

Abstract

Resistance to oestrogen-deprivation therapy is common in oestrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. To better understand the contributions of tumour heterogeneity and evolution to resistance, here we perform comprehensive genomic characterization of 22 primary tumours sampled before and after 4 months of neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor (NAI) treatment. Comparing whole-genome sequencing of tumour/normal pairs from the two time points, with coincident tumour RNA sequencing, reveals widespread spatial and temporal heterogeneity, with marked remodelling of the clonal landscape in response to NAI. Two cases have genomic evidence of two independent tumours, most obviously an ER- 'collision tumour', which was only detected after NAI treatment of baseline ER+ disease. Many mutations are newly detected or enriched post treatment, including two ligand-binding domain mutations in ESR1. The observed clonal complexity of the ER+ breast cancer genome suggests that precision medicine approaches based on genomic analysis of a single specimen are likely insufficient to capture all clinically significant information.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 106 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 6 5%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 21%
Mathematics 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2016.
All research outputs
#310,350
of 25,413,176 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#4,701
of 57,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,158
of 376,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#90
of 771 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,413,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 771 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.