You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neurolinguistic programming: a systematic review of the effects on health outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp12x658287 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jackie Sturt, Saima Ali, Wendy Robertson, David Metcalfe, Amy Grove, Claire Bourne, Chris Bridle |
| Abstract |
Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) in health care has captured the interest of doctors, healthcare professionals, and managers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 15% |
| Malaysia | 18 | 15% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 59 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 93 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 12% |
| Scientists | 9 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Macao | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 287 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 16% |
| Unknown | 79 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 59 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 16% |
| Unknown | 81 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#282,831
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#98
of 4,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,435
of 203,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.