↓ Skip to main content

Genetics of familial forms of thrombocytopenia

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Genetics of familial forms of thrombocytopenia
Published in
Human Genetics, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00439-012-1215-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo L. Balduini, Anna Savoia

Abstract

The joint application of clinical and genetic investigation to patients with inherited thrombocytopenias, as well as the availability of new methods for studying megakaryopoiesis, has greatly expanded the knowledge of these disorders in the last few years with regard to their etiology, pathogenesis and clinical aspects. In particular, new diseases have been described, as deriving from mutations in the genes FLNA, TUBB1, ITGA2/ITGB3, ANKRD26, CYCS, and ABCG5 or ABCG8. Moreover, forms previously considered separate entities were found to be different clinical aspects of a single disease. For instance, identification of MYH9 as the gene whose mutations cause the May-Hegglin anomaly led to the recognition that Sebastian platelet syndrome, Epstein syndrome, and Fechtner syndrome derive from mutations of the same gene and describe overlapping disorders. Despite these advances, knowledge of hereditary thrombocytopenias is still far from satisfactory because for approximately half of the patients it is not possible to formulate a definite diagnosis in that their illnesses has not yet been described. In this review, we provide a systematic description of hereditary thrombocytopenias as we know them today, giving special attention to genetic aspects.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 72 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 24 31%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,175,598
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#895
of 2,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,113
of 167,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.