↓ Skip to main content

How collaboration impacts citation flows within the German science system

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
How collaboration impacts citation flows within the German science system
Published in
Scientometrics, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11192-016-2092-1
Authors

Valeria Aman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Librarian 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 8 44%
Computer Science 3 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,812,370
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#2,228
of 2,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,805
of 364,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#55
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.