You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
日本の種牡馬の死亡原因に関する回顧的調査
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.12935/jvma.65.511 |
| Authors |
畠添 孝, 中西 信吾, 木村 慶純, 三角 一浩 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,849,541
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,862
of 252,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.