↓ Skip to main content

The pathway to care in post-natal depression: women's attitudes to post-natal depression and its treatment.

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, July 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
48 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The pathway to care in post-natal depression: women's attitudes to post-natal depression and its treatment.
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, July 1996
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Whitton, R Warner, L Appleby

Abstract

Women suffering from post-natal depression were interviewed about their symptoms, help-seeking behaviour and treatment. Over 90% recognized there was something wrong, but only one-third believed they were suffering from post-natal depression. Over 80% had not reported their symptoms to any health professional.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 27%
Psychology 24 24%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2017.
All research outputs
#843,164
of 25,599,531 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#364
of 4,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187
of 28,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,599,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them